thanks to Mr Toop in Harrogate
and Martin Wilson
somewhat disguised pythagorean triples
maybe avoid using a calculator
median
don steward
mathematics teaching 10 ~ 16
don steward
mathematics teaching 10 ~ 16
Showing posts with label recurring decimals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recurring decimals. Show all posts
Saturday, 19 October 2019
Monday, 13 February 2017
recurring decimals
this idea is due to Martin Wilson in Harrogate
I have slightly adapted his questions, only to provide easily checked answers
I have slightly adapted his questions, only to provide easily checked answers
Monday, 6 January 2014
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
fractions to recurring decimals
an opportunity to do some ('bus stop') division
having looked at thirds, ninths and elevenths
a ppt is here
see also the posting on Puntmat relating to this topic
how can you tell what number the sevenths start with?
picture from Puntmat
(originally from Wikimedia)
note that opposite digits on the circle sum to 9
again, opposite digits sum to 9
the 'length' of the 31ths blocks are only 15 digits
youtube video:
998,001
numberphile
introduced by
Dr James Grime
where did the 8 go?
31ths repeat after 15 digits
41ths repeat after only 5 digits
more information on wikipedia
having looked at thirds, ninths and elevenths
a ppt is here
see also the posting on Puntmat relating to this topic
picture from Puntmat
(originally from Wikimedia)
note that opposite digits on the circle sum to 9
again, opposite digits sum to 9
the 'length' of the 31ths blocks are only 15 digits
youtube video:
998,001
numberphile
introduced by
Dr James Grime
where did the 8 go?
31ths repeat after 15 digits
41ths repeat after only 5 digits
more information on wikipedia
Tuesday, 4 December 2007
sevenths as a decimal
the repeating pattern for sevenths written as a decimal is fairly easily remembered since it goes 14 28 57 which is
double 7,
double 14,
double 28 ... oops!
the reasons for this are:
if you split the six digit (printing) block for sevenths into two parts and add them: 142 + 857 you get 999 and if you split it into three parts and add them: 14 + 28 + 57 you get 99
this neat property is shared by the block of six repeating numbers for thirteenths and other decimal equivalents to fractions
and also, it might be interesting to note that ...
double 7,
double 14,
double 28 ... oops!
the reasons for this are:
- 100 divided by 7 is 14 remainder 2
- so the next block of two digits will be the result of dividing 200 by 7, which is 28 (remainder 4)
- so the next block of two digits will be the result of dividing 400 by 7, which is 57 (not 56) remainder 1; after which the process repeats itself
if you split the six digit (printing) block for sevenths into two parts and add them: 142 + 857 you get 999 and if you split it into three parts and add them: 14 + 28 + 57 you get 99
this neat property is shared by the block of six repeating numbers for thirteenths and other decimal equivalents to fractions
and also, it might be interesting to note that ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






























