median
don steward
mathematics teaching 10 ~ 16

Showing posts with label divisibility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label divisibility. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 December 2018

four numbers

the powerpoint is here

thanks to Mike Askew for this question

it explores oddness and evenness
and divisibility by 4, including - possibly - a divisibility test for 4

and it can be set in the context of probability
finding all the outcomes, theoretically
maybe checking these by experiment






Sunday, 18 May 2014

1 to 9 multiplied

the idea for this (and the first question) is from nrich 1134

thinking enables the (usually unique) solutions to be found



































also see: NRICH multiplication equation sudoku

Sunday, 11 September 2011

Thursday, 16 April 2009

divisibility tests DIY

using ~ to mean 'is a factor of'.
this work involves simple algebra and some knowledge of multiplication tables

divisibility test for 7

 what's happening here?







suppose you want a divisibility test for 7
split the number into the number of Tens (T) and the number of Units (U).
7 ~ 10T + U
7 ~ 7T + 3T + U [technique: splitting into the divisor + some extra ]
7 ~ 3T + U
so multiply the number of tens by 3 and add the number of units
if this divides by 7 so does the whole number
check: 133 : 3 x 13 + 3 =42 which is in the 7 x table so, so is 133
(42 could be continued: 3 x 4 + 2 = 14)

this isn't a particularly helpful technique for 7
looking for a better one:
it is good to have near decades in the 7 times table
there are two or three: 49, 21, 91 to choose from
which works best?

using 49:
7 ~ 10T + U
7 ~ 10T + U + 49U
7 ~ 10(T + 5U)
7 ~ T + 5U
so if 7 is a factor of T + 5U then it is a factor of the original number
check: 91 : 9 + 5 x 1 = 14.

using 21:
7 ~ 10T + U
7 ~ 10T + U - 21U
7 ~ 10(T - 2U)
7 ~ T - 2U
So if 7 is a factor of T - 2U then it is a factor of the original number
check: 357 : 35 - 2 x 7 = 21.

This (latest) test is claimed to have originated in Russia
and can be extended to larger numbers, e.g. 6951:
695 - 2 = 693
69 - 6 = 63
6 - 6 = 0, is a M(7) so 6951 is a multiple of 7.

using 91:
7 ~ 10T + U
7 ~ 10T + U - 91U
7 ~ 10(T - 9U)
7 ~ T - 9U
7 ~ T - 7U - 2U
7 ~ T - 2U (as before)

David Wilson offers this planar graph to test for divisibility by 7:
write down a number n
start at the small white node at the bottom of the graph
for each digit d in n, follow d black arrows in a succession, and as you move from one digit to the next, follow 1 white arrow

for example, if n = 325, follow 3 black arrows, then 1 white arrow, then 2 black arrows, then 1 white arrow, and finally 5 black arrows

if you end up back at the white node, n is divisible by 7.



divisibility test for 13

39 could be helpful:
13 ~ 10T + U
13 ~ 10T + U + 39U
13 ~ 10(T + 4U)
so if T + 4U is a multiple of 13 so is the original number

or, using 91:
13 ~ 10T + U
13 ~ 10T + U - 91U
13 ~ 10(T - 9U)
13 ~ T - 9U
so if T - 9U is a multiple of 13 so is the original number

establish these tests (or better still, find your own)
  • T + 2U for 19
  • T + 3U for 29
  • T - 3U for 31
  • T - 5U for 17
  • 2T + U for 8
  • 2T - U for 12
  • T + 7U for 23
  • T + 10U for 33
and of course,
  • T + U for 9 
  • T - U for 11

some related questions:
What is the largest three-digit multiple of 7?
What is the largest three-digit multiple of 13?
What is the largest three-digit multiple of 19?